Re: NCAA expanding to 96 teams?

by Purple_Portland_Pilot_113 Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:38 am

Thank you for clearing that up. I understand now, that that was then, and this is now. Conferences have gotten bigger and the tournament should stay at 64 (Not 65) teams. Thank you very much, I really appreciate it DaTruRochin and NewUPFan.

by Woodless! Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:58 am

Rochin54 wrote:When i was little, I had to blow on my video games to make them work.

Winner is you!

by mattywizz Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:35 am

Did anyone else see gameday today? They were talking about the tournament, who's in, who's out and whatnot. Then Jay Bilas says something to the effect of, "This is the weakest at-large year ever. We aren't talking about who is better than other teams, but who is worse and doesn't deserve to be in." So what you're saying is that there are not 64 (er, 65) deserving teams. I think now would be an excellent time to expand to 96, or 132 or...

by **DaTruRochin** Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:25 am

New article today in the NY Times about expansion, and if it does happen, it should be used to bring in more programs like SMC and UNI, not mediocre teams from big conferences:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/sports/ncaabasketball/22thamel.html?src=twt&twt=nytimes