2010-2011 Schedule So Far

onetouchfutbol wrote:I like the WSU and Utah games on the schedule...tough, but, not impossible. I'd still like to see more efforts to schedule other successful mid-majors... maybe Sienna or Butler. I like how RPI won't be an excuse though. Either we get the job done or we don't.

PurplePrideTrumpet wrote:I don't know what the mid-major Top 25 uses to define who the mid-majors are. I do know there is no definitive definition of what a mid-major is. One that I like is the one used by the Mid-Majority. They use the size of the school's athletic budget. They refer to the "red line" to separate the mid-majors from the power conference teams:

http://midmajority.com/redline.php

Under this model Utah is not a mid-major as it plays in the Mountain West, a conference whose members have a larger athletic budget than most of the schools playing DI basketball.

For my part I will say I like the look of the schedule so far. Rev Larry have done well this offseason to get challenging opponents.

We have our position on this, and it's been a clear and constantly repeated one for years now. College basketball is about money first and foremost, and there are haves, and have-lesses. Don't think budgets matter? Tell it to a school that's had its coach hired away for double his previous salary, or a program that was drubbed in the recruiting game by a bigger school with more money to burn and a name that you can find on the front of sweatshirts at Modell's. Competitive balance has long been a major issue in professional sports -- you don't expect the small-market Rays to hang with the big-bucks Yankees, do you? -- and the NCAA will never, ever have a salary cap or basement.

Here at The Mid-Majority, we are instituting the simple, clear answer that has so far been lacking. There's a red line at $20 million (a college hoops Mendoza line, if you will), and any conferences with a higher average athletic budget should have all the resources they need with which to recruit top players and hire top coaches and buy wins. Can't win with all that dough? Tough luck. Any conference below the line is performing small miracles if they can even compete on the same court as the six "power" and two "money" leagues, and this site's primary focus has been celebrating those victories for the great moments they are.

(These are all figures from the U.S. Department of Postsecondary Education, for the reporting year 2006-07.)

Conference Avg. Athletic Budget (2006-07)
Big Ten $64,407,135
Southeastern $61,210,151
Big 12 $54,578,398
Pac-10 $52,429,372
Atlantic Coast $49,445,289
Big East $33,412,163
Mountain West $24,181,211
Conference USA $23,763,832
----------------------------------------
Western Athletic $18,488,894
Mid-American $18,134,643
Ivy League $17,404,754
Colonial $15,096,573
America East $14,755,456
Atlantic 10 $14,239,811
Patriot League $13,738,675
Sun Belt $12,524,273
Missouri Valley $12,225,798
West Coast $11,877,780
Big West $11,333,199
Big Sky $9,671,491
Southern $9,499,831
Big South $9,014,941
Horizon League $8,619,016
Northeast $8,479,495
Metro Atlantic $8,401,285
Ohio Valley $8,069,520
MEAC $7,178,790
Summit League $7,123,854
Southland $7,017,045
Atlantic Sun $6,383,582
SWAC $5,224,433
Independents $5,059,803
You can call any program whatever you want, I don't care what your definitions are; I'm done with that argument. But if you're above The Line, I won't talk about you until when you get beat. If you're below The Line, I'll cover you -- like it or not. This will be revisited every summer when the new figures come out and the conferences fall above or below The Line, and we'll plan our coverage accordingly. And in the big picture, of course, whether I talk about your favorite conference or not, or attend its games, is irrelevant.

You still think there's competitive balance in college basketball? You think this is a "democracy?" Sure, maybe one ruled by Reaganomics. In non-conference play this season, when teams from below The Line have played teams from above it, teams above won 91 percent of the time. We tracked that in our Monday Boubacars before the calendar year turned over.

The gap is real. Pretending it doesn't exist doesn't mean there isn't one.

Hey, look, I don't like the term "mid-major" either, but it's the term we inherited from previous generations. Do you have a better label for smaller conferences with smaller schools? Let's hear it. It had better be catchier and more descriptive than "non-major" (you thought "mid" was demeaning), "small college" (which could also include Division II) or "low major" (a term we never use around here anyway). Until we come up with a better tag for schools in conferences that spend pennies on the dollar on athletics compared to the big boys, this ridiculous "debate" is never going to end.

Stonehouse wrote:Official date for Washington... Dec. 6 @ Hec Ed:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/huskies/2012055808_umen08.html